By Ian Christopher Levy
The significant other to John Wyclif comprises 8 enormous essays (2-3, phrases each one) which conceal all of the significant components of Wyclif's existence and suggestion. each one essay offers well timed learn that's completely grounded within the basic texts whereas utilising the latest secondary literature. Essays comprise: existence and occupation; good judgment and metaphysics; Trinity and Christology; ecclesiology and politics; the Christian existence; sacraments; the Bible; his rivals. there is not any related ebook to be had this day.
Read Online or Download A Companion to John Wyclif (Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition, Volume 4) PDF
Best religion books
In keeping with the unique handwritten manuscript, this booklet presents a brand new, exact version of Hume’s very important paintings, devoted to his unique textual content, marginal notes, and adjustments. Stanley Tweyman’s finished creation supplies an interpretation of the Dialogues as a complete, in addition to shut research of every of the work’s twelve components.
Finally of religion, Sam Harris gives you a startling research of the conflict among cause and faith within the glossy international. He deals a shiny, ancient journey of our willingness to droop cause in desire of non secular beliefs—even whilst those ideals motivate the worst human atrocities. whereas caution opposed to the encroachment of prepared faith into global politics, Harris attracts on insights from neuroscience, philosophy, and japanese mysticism to bring a decision for a really glossy origin for ethics and spirituality that's either secular and humanistic.
Auch wenn das Thema - naturgemass - bereits viel diskutiert und beschrieben worden ist, eroffnen sich doch neue Aspekte, wenn guy mit strikter Konzentration auf eine rechtshistorische Betrachtungsweise den geschriebenen textual content analysiert. Genau das tut der vorliegende Band und kommt zu dem geradezu zwangslaufigen Ergebnis, dass Jesus im volligen Einklang mit den Regeln des romischen Straf- und Prozessrechts verurteilt worden ist.
- Einblicke in die Religion des Islam
- From Word to Silence, Vol. 2: The way of negation, Christian and Greek
- Das Gottesvolk und seine Geschichte. Geschichtsbild und Selbstverständnis im palästinensischen Schrifttum von Jesus Sirach bis Jehuda ha-Nas
- [UNREADABLE] Narrative in the Hebrew Bible
- The Books of the Maccabees: History, Theology, Ideology
Extra resources for A Companion to John Wyclif (Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition, Volume 4)
66 In De potestate papae, he condemns prebends who fail to fulﬁll their 63 Workman, 1:153, 156–71, Robson, Wyclif, p. 14. H. Lloyd, “John Wyclif and the Prebend of Lincoln,” English Historical Review, 61 (1946), 388–94. 65 For defenses of Wyclif ’s pluralism and non-residency, see Workman, 1:161–9; MacFarlane, John Wyclif, pp. 23–27. Workman argues that Wyclif ’s failure to provide a vicar was not due to a lack of concern but rather to an inability to ﬁnd a suitable vicar owing to the problems created by the Black Death, a reasonable but entirely speculative argument.
77 John Gilbert had been translated from Bangor to Hereford, and Ralph Erghum had been appointed to Salisbury, both by way of the papal provisions that they had opposed at Bruges but that the ﬁnal concordat ultimately permitted, while Wyclif, whose presumed opposition to provisions may have cost him his place on the third delegation, received nothing. On the surface Hallum’s statement reﬂects a disparity in the way the delegates were rewarded for their eﬀorts. But on deeper examination, Hallum’s charges ring false.
However, by rejecting the political motive for the summons, Dahmus has thrown out the suﬃcient cause for the argument. If political motives played no part in the summons, why did the summons happen the way it did? Why were they brought early in 1377, at a time when the bishops must certainly have known about Gaunt’s support for Wyclif ? At a time when the episcopate was embroiled in a conﬂict with Gaunt, why did they allow themselves to be diverted into examining heresy charges? If this was just a heresy trial, why was Sudbury reluctant to commit to it, and why were the proceedings atypically presided over by the archbishop and not the bishop of Lincoln?