By Bernd Kortmann
The sequence is a platform for contributions of every kind to this speedily constructing box. basic difficulties are studied from the point of view of person languages, language households, language teams, or language samples. Conclusions are the results of a deepened learn of empirical info. detailed emphasis is given to little-known languages, whose research might shed new mild on long-standing difficulties ordinarily linguistics.
Read or Download Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages PDF
Similar grammar books
During this unique learn, Hilde Hasselg? rd discusses using adverbials in English, via studying examples present in daily texts. Adverbials - clause parts that usually seek advice from situations of time, house, cause and demeanour - conceal quite a number meanings and will be positioned at the start, within the heart or on the finish of a sentence.
Focusing totally on Swedish, a Germanic language whose debris haven't formerly been studied widely, Non-Projecting phrases: A Case learn on Swedish debris develops a thought of non-projecting phrases during which debris are morphologically self sufficient phrases that don't undertaking words. debris have lengthy constituted a puzzle for Germanic syntax, as they show homes of either morphological and syntactic constructs.
Ergativity is without doubt one of the major demanding situations either for linguistic and acquisition theories. This ebook is exclusive, taking a cross-linguistic method of the purchase of ergativity in a wide number of typologically targeted languages. The chapters disguise languages from diverse households and from diversified geographic parts with diverse expressions of ergativity.
- Cleft Structures
- Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English (Theoretical Linguistics)
- Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity
- The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya
- The grammar of autobiography: a developmental account
- Verb Constructions in German and Dutch
Extra info for Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages
Radford 1988: 135). In essence, the state of the art concerning the status of adverbial subordinators in generative theory, including Rauh (1993), can be characterized as follows. First, like traditional prepositions, adverbs and particles, adverbial subordinators form a subcategory of the category Ρ (for Preposition), which in turn counts as a major lexical (head-of-phrase) category along with nouns, verbs and adjectives. Second, it is still unclear what determines the range of complements a member of the category Ρ can take, i.
2. 3. Cognitive semantics Another rich source of inspiration for this study has been cognitive semantics, especially of the brand associated with the writings by Elizabeth Closs Traugott (beginning with Traugott 1982) and Eve Sweetser (culminating in Sweetser 1990). This type of cognitive semantics also draws on (Neo-)Gricean hypotheses and principles like Levinson's Principle of Informativeness (1983: 146 — 147, 1987). Central to their studies in the semantics and pragmatics of, among other things, adverbial connectives is the concept of semantic relatedness: what they are ultimately striving for is a unified, motivated account of polysemy, observable semantic changes, and pragmatic ambiguities in terms of fundamental cognitive processes at work in communication and human perception of the world (cf.
Thus the assumption of iconicity in language, as explored and illustrated in various publications by John Haiman (1980, 1985a, 1985b) and Talmy Givón (1985, 1990), provides fruitful ideas on what can be learnt about conceptual structure via the analysis of linguistic structure, espe- 2. Theoretical foundations 15 daily, of course, when comparing data from a wide range of languages. For instance, the degree of coding (involving especially a decrease in formal complexity, morphological and semantic reconstructability, and an increase in semantic and functional variability and, possibly, frequency of use) may serve as an indicator of what kinds of concepts can be said to be central or peripheral to the language user, or (maybe: and thus) cognitively primitive or complex.